What is the ‘trigger’ in storytelling?
Image Courtesy: Google |
Trigger in a short story is the point at which the individual
reader’s emotional levels start fluctuating corresponding to a specific action
in a story or according to the changes in the lives of characters.
This is “meeting the reader’s mind”.
In a short story, this moment is very important due to the
limitations of its size. Unlike a novel, the writer should be especially careful in order to bring the reader’s mind to care for the main character’s
agony, joy, or temper within a limited period of time and limited number of
words.
When does a story meet the reader’s mind? A story meets the
reader’s mind when the reader feels connected with the story, through the
events in the story (otherwise known as action) or through lives of characters.
When the story resonates with our conscious or not quite so conscious emotions,
thoughts, or feelings, we say the story is touching.
Is it achievable for an ordinary writer? Of course, yes.
Otherwise, I would not have written my book, Wall of Colours and Other Stories,
or talked with you about writing in this webpage. The secret to achieve
resonance with readers is hidden in the theory identified among literary
critics and academicians as ‘Structuralism’. Ferdinand de Saussure (1857-1913)
put up the base for the revolutionary idea called Structuralism. In the 1950s
Claude Levi-Strauss, an anthropologist and Roland Barthes, a literary critic
used Structuralist ideas in their work. Although largely an outdated movement
in the 21st century, there still are lessons that we can learn from
the structuralists. What we need from the structuralists is the formulation of
a storyteller’s art of meaning making. They believed that comprehensibility does
not function in isolation. When the Deconstructionists caught up with the Structuralists
and argued that any structure can be ruptured if the centre is weak enough. From
then onwards, almost all central structures felt vulnerable. Things started
falling apart. Therefore, the literary world slowly, almost abandoned
Structuralism.
It is like finding a useful metal part, for the car you are
assembling, from a junkyard. Using the very useful idea that comprehensibility does
not function in isolation, we can device an impactful writing tactics. But how
does it work?
The answer lies in the essence of the structuralist concept of
meaning making. It means in order to understand an idea, an event, or a
thought, certain comparisons help. A writer can provide more clarity to his
concepts in relation to something else, rather than in isolation.
In other words, in a story, the intensity of the outburst of joy
in a character could be more appealing to the reader, only when you show the
reader, the pain, the sufferings, and miseries the character had undergone
before reaching the moment of joy. That is when a reader would say, yeah, it
resonated with my situation. That is when you pull the trigger. You got your
reader.
About Anu Lal
Anu Lal is the author of Wall of Colors and Other Stories. He lives in Kerala, South India. He blogs at The Indian Commentator
You can catch up with him in Goodreads too.
Your ideas are really worth reading. However, I felt the ideas are more or less connected with reader-response theory.. ".... the intensity of the outburst of joy in a character could be more appealing to the reader, only when you show the reader, the pain, the sufferings, and miseries the character had undergone before reaching the moment of joy." I think this idea is found more common in this yet another related idea of Russian Formalism, especially how we can develop an idea by making it strange, "defamiliarisation." You have brought up some good points here.
ReplyDelete